POITOU, FRANCE – “We live in a slow-growth world,” summarized a canny friend, “but with high-growth debt and high-growth asset prices.”
Today, we turn to a report on Zero Hedge for further precision. But we’ll get to that in a minute.
First, let’s begin with less precision…
The promise of the Trump administration was, in a nutshell, that it would look ahead and improve the future before we got there.
Drain the “swamp”… cut the regulations… slash corporate tax rates by about 20%… kill O’care… raise tariffs on imports to reduce the trade deficit – these are all measures that were supposed to increase stagnant economic growth rates.
Higher growth would then fill the malls and restaurants and make it possible to pay our debts.
With the exception of the boneheaded proposal for tariff hikes from Trump’s trade czar, Peter Navarro – which would have the opposite effect – these changes might have been successful.
Too bad “The Donald” has been able to fulfill so few of his campaign promises.
We predicted as much. We were right. And many Dear Readers will never forgive us. They seem to think that because we saw it coming, we willed failure upon Team Trump.
We deny the charge. We have no such power.
In yesterday’s mailbag alone, several readers objected. For example:
Mr. Bonner, you have been out of this country too long. You have lost touch with the everyday American – yes, the “idiots,” as the libs say, that put President Trump in office.
Read Mr. GINGRICH’s book UNDERSTANDING TRUMP. I’ve always enjoyed a lot you write but you’re way off base on the president. I’m afraid you may fall into Taleb’s IYI group.
– Stanley P.
IYI group? We had to look it up.
Black Swan author Nassim Taleb is writing a new book called Skin in the Game. In an excerpt, he argues that many of the elite are “Intellectual-Yet-Idiots.”
We don’t contest the “idiot” allegation, but we know Nassim, and we doubt that we are the sort of idiot he has in mind.
You have it wrong. Trump is not the reason the swamp isn’t draining. It’s because of people like you that blame one man, the president, for decades of abuse from Congress on the American people. Everyone that has their personal agenda is preventing him from draining the swamp.
Do you really think one man can do it? If you do, you are more challenged than I thought. Rather than being like everyone else and piling on, here’s an idea: Why not look at the positive things Trump has done?
Because if he hadn’t, you and everyone else would really be running for the hills by now. Or in your case, the failed ranch. I am so sick and tired of you people that claim to be so smart about everything. You are no different than Congress. You are all the same… the swamp that will destroy this country.
– Michael P.
Uh… that was just our point. One man – especially one as limited as Donald J. Trump – couldn’t beat the Deep State.
As to how that makes us a swamp critter, we have no idea.
Another comment from the Diary mailbag:
The president won’t be throttled so easily. In my opinion, from 80+ years of voting and observation, Mr. Bonner is leaping to his conclusions and has been swallowing too much swamp water.
– Robert B.
But today, we will leap even further with an even bolder prediction: The only thing the president will achieve is a partial implementation of his least worthy objective: putting up trade barriers.
A major reform of the tax code… O’care… entitlements… even the border wall with Mexico… will require Congress to go along. Mr. Trump won’t get it. He’s a win-lose guy. Not a cooperation guy.
That leaves only war making and trade – areas where the chief executive can put up his own walls.
Mr. Trump has already given up his America First foreign policy pledge. Next, he will turn over tax reform and monetary policy to the Goldman Group – led by Cohn and Mnuchin. That will leave him with only one wall left: trade policy.
A report out yesterday by news outlet Axios tells us that Mr. Trump is getting frustrated. In a private meeting, he urged his underlings to get out their trowels. He reportedly said to them, “I want tariffs. Bring me some tariffs!”
Tariffs he will probably get. And they will have the result they always have: stifling international win-win deals, slowing trade, and reducing economic growth.
Which brings us back to the point of departure…
U.S. asset prices… and debt… depend on future output. People must pay their debts… and buy their products and services… with tomorrow’s income.
Keeping it simple, U.S. national debt – at least according to the official tally – doubled over the last eight years. But output and incomes didn’t double.
Instead, GDP went from $14 trillion to $18 trillion, an increase of less than 30% (again, based on official figures).
In other words, government debt is increasing more than three times faster than the economy that sustains it.
And over the same eight-year period, U.S. stock prices tripled, increasing 10 times faster than the economy they depend on!
As reported in this space, in terms of sales – which can’t be fudged – U.S. stock prices haven’t been this high since the heady days of the dot-com bubble.
And a new report on Zero Hedge, by fund manager Francesco Filia, tells us that in terms of anticipated growth, stock prices are higher than ever before:
When measured against potential growth, even on its highest earnings, the S&P has never before been this expensive. It is 60% above its historical average fair value. […] [T]he point we make is that the willingness of investors to pay up for future earnings – even the most generous one as multiples are projected against the highest such earnings in 10 years – must be related to potential GDP growth in the years ahead, as an historically-reliable proxy for earnings potential.
It is one thing to buy 30x earnings if the economy grows furiously; it is quite another to spend that much if the economy slow-walks. […] The thing is that long-run growth has declined for decades now, as it is embroiled in the structural trends of Secular Stagnation: bad demographics (declining labor participation rates and shrinking working population in advanced economies), over-capacity and over-indebtedness, falling productivity of new credit, low productivity of labor and capital, disruption from new technologies. […]
The downtrend in potential growth spans several decades; an inversion is possible but imprudent to factor in.
Future incomes will support neither stocks nor bonds. Prices of both must come down.
BY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE, Bonner & partners
Gold is staging a major breakout…
For most of the year, gold has been trapped in a range between $1,200 and $1,300 an ounce.
And earlier this month, we told you to keep an eye on the $1,300-an-ounce mark for the yellow metal.
We also told you that a break above that level would be strongly bullish for gold.
Fueled by fear that North Korea’s firing of a missile over Japan could lead to nuclear war… gold has surged to $1,325 an ounce.
Now that it’s broken out of its trading range to the upside… expect more bullish action for gold ahead.
– Chris Lowe
The Impact of “De-Equitization”
The number of publicly listed companies has fallen by almost half over the last two decades. Surprisingly, this shrinking supply of equities, a trend known as “de-equitization,” could explain why the market seems to go nowhere but up.
Five Traits of Successful Investors
What separates good investors from great ones? Here are five qualities to cultivate for your own investing.
America Is Not Prepared for This Crime Wave
Images of protests turned violent continue to plaster the news. But behind the scenes is a new type of criminal element. And this one could be the most dangerous of all.
In today’s mailbag, conversation turns toward America’s looming debt ceiling…
With regards to America’s debt… People seem to forget that Bill Clinton submitted and got passed balanced budgets his last 4 years and, over his 8 years, managed to pay down the national debt. Now Newt and his conservative friends like to take credit. But Newt G. wasn’t there the last 4 years. It’s just 4th grade arithmetic. No new economic theory like Laffer likes to sell. If G.W. had followed through we would have had no debt after four years, but like Reagan, he couldn’t stand balanced budgets.
Reagan said many times that debt doesn’t matter while he never submitted a balanced budget and quadrupled the national debt over his time as president. Look it up.
So now we have another president that wants to cut welfare and dump more money on defense which is the most wasteful part of the government. Why do we have to spend almost as much on defense as the rest of the world combined? I thought we were supposed to be more efficient than those communist countries. We have two giant oceans and two friendly countries on our borders. If Trump wants to cut waste all he needs to do is go across town to the Pentagon and take a look around.
– Paul L.
And how can the Fed not immediately go to QE4 when the Treasury is out of cash and Congress is $20 trillion in debt and running a $633 billion deficit through July? Plus Social Security is running its own “off-budget” deficit. And there is a political explosion ready to take place around the raising of the debt limit. With default and a credit rating decrease going with it?
It seems that there are plenty of other guaranteed triggers for the next market crash.
– Bert M.
Our friends at the Palm Beach Research Group just uncovered something…
After the crash of 2008, billions of dollars that were “lost” didn’t just disappear. Instead, that massive amount of wealth shifted to a new “stock market.”
This “New Nasdaq” is 100% outside of Wall Street, and it’s showing gains of as much as 6,333% in as little as two months. Learn more here.