GUALFIN, Argentina – Global stock markets had a strong day of gains yesterday.
Bloomberg reported that the Dow rose 390 points – or 2.4% – “on optimism over China.”
We hold our breath and wonder: What next?
The U.S. investor thinks he has some idea of what is going on in China. Good luck to him!
And there is no reason for stocks to ALL be worth more money… even if China were looking up.
Some should go up and some should go down – depending on how investors see new developments affecting their earnings. For some companies, China is a competitor. For others, it is a supplier. Some want China’s costs to go up. Some want them to go down.
Studies have shown no hard and fast relationship between current economic growth and stock prices. But it’s more than fishy that, over the last six years, the S&P 500 has risen about seven times as fast as U.S. GDP.
We know what was going on; it has nothing to do with optimism over China. The Fed was manipulating the price of U.S. stocks by way of ZIRP and QE – essentially stealing wealth from Main Street (savers, workers, retirees, and small businesses) and giving it to Wall Street (insiders, cronies, investors, bankers, speculators, and big businesses).
There are many ways to take what isn’t yours away from the rightful owners. Here’s another one:
“The natives who lived in Gualfin were the last to surrender to the Spanish… according to legend anyway.”
Jorge, our ranch foreman, is getting ready to retire. He was reflecting on the problems facing the ranch.
“They retreated up into the mountains to that rock we call ‘The Fortress.’ That’s where they made their last stand.
“You’ve been there. You can see all the pieces of broken pottery on the ground. Apparently, they went up there with food and water. It’s called ‘The Fortress’ because it is a natural fortification; it was impossible to get them out.
“So, the Spaniards laid siege. And when the locals ran out of food and water, they threw their pots down at the invaders… and then threw themselves off the cliff.
“They were tough people.”
And now, if you believe today’s legends, their descendants are mounting a counterattack. They are trying to take back what was lost four centuries ago.
There have been whispers of insurrection ever since we got here nine years ago. Now, things are heating up.
Taking Back the Valley
News of the coming revolt reached your editor last week…
He went to visit a neighboring property, the Hess family’s Bodega Colomé. One of the executives gave us a warning.
“It’s coming. They have brought in professional organizers. They’re paid by the government to stir up trouble. It’s part of the Kirchner administration’s attempt to buy votes.
“They tell the local people they have the right to the land because their great-great-great-grandfathers lived here. The organizers go around and appoint a cacique – a chief – who is supposed to bring the people together to fight the landowners.
“These caciques had a meeting recently. One of my employees reported that they have a plan to take the whole valley. They’re beginning here. Then they’re going to march up and take your place too.”
This was bad news. But it had a comic tinge to it.
How could they really take back land that had been stolen, fair and square, in the 16th century?
What kind of precedent would that set?
Would it mean that Americans would have to give Manhattan back to the descendants of the tribe that lived there (if they could find any)?
And of all the thousands of descendants of the original inhabitants, who may or may not have crossed the river at what is today St. Louis, who among them would have the right to the city?
And wasn’t all of Australia taken from the Aboriginals in the 18th century? Will that have to be given back?
It seemed crazy…
Rise of the Originarios
“No, it’s true,” said Hugo.
Hugo is one of the local people who calls himself an originario. He is a young, burly man who, aside from making adobe bricks, has no visible means of support.
Rumor has it that he receives pesos from the local mayor; he is a political operative. He may be the local cacique. We don’t know. But he came to see us last Friday, with a declaration of war.
“Hugo,” we asked, “are you saying that you have special rights simply because your great-grandparents may have lived here?”
“Yes. We are originarios. We have a right to the land, the air, and the water. It is only natural.”
“Does that mean that the land I bought is yours? Have you been paying the property taxes on it?”
“No, no,” Hugo smiled slyly. “We don’t have to pay property taxes. And I don’t have to sign your rental contract. Because I’m anoriginario. I have special rights.”
“How many other people who live here have these rights?” we wanted to know.
“Well, I don’t know. It is for each person to declare himself.”
“Most of these families are not originally from here,” we continued. “They came from neighboring farms a generation or so ago.”
“I don’t know if that matters,” Hugo replied.
“Well, if where your grandparents came from doesn’t really matter, doesn’t that create a problem?
“Couldn’t you claim any property you want? I mean, the rest of us have to pay for property. We rent or we buy. Or we inherit. I’ve never heard of anyone who got someone else’s land simply because his ancestor may or may not have once lived there.”
“It’s a law. It’s an international law that was made in the 1990s. You can look it up.”
“We Don’t Have to Pay You”
“Funny that I never heard of it before…” we replied.
“And I don’t see how it can work. You probably had a lot of ancestors who lived here… and at Tacuil and Colomé, too [neighboring properties]. How do you know which one you have a right to?”
“It is for each originario to declare it for himself… depending on where he lives now.”
“Hmmm, sounds a little vague. Everybody has to have four grandparents, eight great-grandparents… am I doing this right?… and 16 great-great-grandparents. It is likely they come from different places. So, does this mean you have the right to 16 different properties? Or more?
“Or look at it from the other angle. If each of your 16 great-great-grandparents had four children… and each of them had four children… and so on… that would mean about 2,000 descendants. How do you decide who gets what?”
“Señor Bonner, no. It doesn’t work that way. It’s just where you live. You have the right to that.”
“So you’re saying I don’t have the rights to my land that I thought I had.”
“Yes… that’s right. This land belongs to the originarios. We don’t have to pay you. We don’t have to sign a contract.”
“Maybe we should get all the people who claim to be originariostogether and figure out who has the right to what. I mean, I just want to know.
“I’m investing a lot. I think I’ll just leave if I don’t have the right to the land. I’ll stop paying salaries. I’ll stop buying equipment. I’ll stop investing.
“And if I get chased off by this originario thing, who will take my place?
“Nobody. And how will anyone here be better off is no one is bringing in money from the outside to try to make it a viable property?”
“I don’t know… We’re not trying to drive you off…”
“Oh…” To be continued…
Lifting stock market prices isn’t the only effect of the Fed’s QE.
Each year, the Fed turns over the interest from the roughly $4 trillion of bonds on its balance sheets – minus the cost of its operations – to the Treasury.
Effectively, this allows the Treasury to borrow without having to pay interest on its bonds.
Today’s chart shows Fed profits – mainly from the income on the bonds on its balance sheet – going back to 2000.
The profits, which the Fed turns over to the Treasury, have soared from $35 billion in 2008 to over $100 billion in 2014.
That’s roughly what JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the U.S., earned in total revenues last year.
The Oil Sands Glut Is About to Get a Lot Bigger
Despite plunging prices, Canadian oil sands projects will add another 500,000 barrels a day – a roughly 25% increase in Alberta – to the already oversupplied North American market.
How to Protect Yourself from a “Financial Warfare” Attack
China, Russia, and Iran could be planning to target your wallet – with a “financial warfare” attack that would cripple America’s economy. Here’s exactly what to do to protect yourself…
Toxic “Liar Loans” Are Sneaking Back into the Bond Market
Mortgages similar to the so-called liar loans – made without verifying people’s finances – are creeping back into the market. And, like last time, they’re spreading risks far and wide.
We got a lot of great feedback on yesterday’s issue about the absurdity of a living wage.
I love your list of fixed wages! You called it exactly the way it should be!
You really made me laugh when I read this, imagining this to be the truth in our world! Teachers, scientists, and nurses SHOULD be making more than corporate CEOs.
After all, they’re the ones who train and take care of future corporate CEOs. They do the real hard work to make sure that everyone else has what they need!
Thanks for your wild and true thinking!
– Michele N.
How about pilots $100K, presidents of the U.S. $99K, U.S. senators $49K, U.S. representatives $48K, shoeshine persons $36K? Fun stuff!
– Henry P.
Your list had a minimum wage of $30K. Why stop there? How about $300K? How about three million?
Why does it make a difference? As I understand it, we just print the money as we please anyway.
On the other hand, I do like some of your groupings: corporate CEOs, prostitutes, and hedge fund managers certainly seem to fit well together.
But putting politicians, political scientists, and counterfeiters together is clearly an insult to the counterfeiters. How dare you, sir?
– S. Martin
As someone who lived first half of life in socialism (Yugoslavia), I had privilege of sitting on the commission for the distribution of personal incomes in one educational institution.
We had general guideline from ministry of finances with span of incomes of 1 to 5. No. 1 was set as janitorial pay and No. 5 for PhD professor. That one was further limited with minimum pay in absolute amount as set by law.
My entire experience was that I had such poisonous relations with most employees that it greatly encouraged me to move to U.S. As the organization was fairly small, how income was distributed depended very much who populated that commission.
The distribution highly depended on how shameless was the vocal minority of commission members.
– Tony R.