GUALFIN, ARGENTINA – “What business school did you go to?”
We were joking, of course.
But the two young men needed an alternative point of view. In the course of getting their MBAs in Chicago, they had picked up some bad ideas about investing.
“Shouldn’t we just buy a low-cost ETF that tracks the S&P 500 and sit tight?” one had asked. “That’s what Warren Buffett recommends. We’re young. Over the long run, it should pay off.”
But let’s back up…
These questions came in such extraordinary and unlikely circumstances, we should probably tell you about the whole adventure.
On Monday, we were invited to lunch at a neighbor’s house. We knew where the house was; we located it on Google Earth. And from the hill behind our house, we can see the distant valley where it is located.
Besides, it is a legendary place… part of the history of Argentina.
“Yes,” explained the owner. “The Spanish were here even before they began the general conquest of the province. And when the famous conquistador – the first one – Diego de Almagro arrived here, he found chickens.
“Chickens had to come from Spain. They weren’t native to the New World. They were left here by the first Spanish explorers in the 16th century. Nobody knows their names, but they were here.”
But we are getting ahead of ourselves…
Although the valley was visible from our ranch, it took three hours of rough-road driving to get there. We had to leave our valley and follow the Calchaquí River north to a village called Seclantás.
There, we turned to the west… and kept going for the next hour and a half.
The drive was magnificent…
The road snaked up and down mountains. Much of the terrain had a fantastical appearance, as though it had been designed by a computer game company.
There were soaring mountains, huge rocky peaks, and glistening rivers far below. One stretch of the road looked as though it had been built by the Incas; Elizabeth closed her eyes as we hugged the cliff so tightly, we almost scraped the paint off the side of the truck.
Bill navigates the difficult Argentine terrain
This far valley gets a lot more rainfall than ours. We get about 5 inches a year. Here, they get three times as much. There were trees, streams, and well-watered fields everywhere. Clouds hung over the mountaintops, delivering a light snow. Down below, it was still warm.
When we finally reached our destination, we were warmly greeted by a family from Buenos Aires.
Though the property – some 230,000 acres – has been in the family for more than 300 years, the owners have spent most of their time in the capital city for several generations.
Among them was one recent MBA graduate and a friend from California.
“What a surprise to find you here,” we said.
“Everything here is surprising,” the Californian replied.
“We’re sorry to be late,” we apologized to the mistress of the house. “It took longer than we expected to get here.”
“Oh… that’s one of the surprising things,” she answered graciously.
“Time doesn’t count here. We’re too far from the rest of the world. And until a few years ago, we had even worse roads… and no bridges over the rivers.
“Since there’s only one way into and out of the valley, sometimes we’d get here and we couldn’t leave for weeks. People come when they can get here. And they stay as long as they want.”
The farm used to be much bigger, with 350 tenant farmers.
“My grandfather raised cattle here and sold them in Chile. They drove the cattle up over the mountain and across the desert. They had to put horseshoes on the cattle because the trail was so rocky. But I guess it paid.”
It probably stopped paying in the early 20th century. Then, the whole area went into decline. By the 1980s, the present owner found the main house almost in ruins. He restored it and now uses it regularly.
But he, too, ran into trouble with the originarios – the locals claiming indigenous rights to land around here – though they didn’t call themselves that back then.
They burnt crops and threatened to burn down the main house. Finally, the owner surrendered a large part of the productive area… and made peace.
“Now I have neighbors, not tenants,” he explained philosophically. “It’s much better this way.”
After a delicious and convivial lunch, the young men wanted to talk money.
“Why not just buy a low-cost ETF that tracks the S&P 500?” asked the Californian.
We gave an incomplete and unconvincing answer. Here, we’ll try to do better…
Chris Mayer, one of our top stock pickers, recently emailed us with the example of the popular Wintergreen Fund run by David Winters. It charges 2% a year. That doesn’t seem like a lot. But if the fund, in a typical year, produced a 4% gain, investors gave half of it to the manager.
Put another way, if you had $1 million in this fund, you would be writing a check to Mr. Winters for almost $20,000 a year.
That’s part of the reason record amounts of money have gone into low-cost ETFs that simply give you the returns of an index such as the S&P 500 or the Dow. Investors have gotten the message that they can participate in the stock market’s gains without having to research stocks or pay a manager to look after their money.
But there are several problems…
First and foremost, if you invest in “the market” rather than in particular stocks, you get whatever the market gives you. That can be good if you have the central bank pumping trillions into the financial economy. But it can be bad when the bubble finally pops.
“The performance of the last 30 years is based on the fraud,” we told the young men, “that you can get richer by putting more artificial credit into an economy at artificially low rates. At some point, that credit bubble is going to blow up. And when it does, stock prices could get cut in half and stay there for 20 years.
“That happens even without central bank manipulation, as it did after the stock crash of 1929… and again after the bull market peak in 1966.
“You don’t make money by being the last one into a crowded trade. Especially when the trade is based on a scam. Just because people have done well by tracking the S&P 500 in the current bull market – from 2009 to today – don’t expect that you’ll do anywhere near as well in the future.
“Central banks worldwide have boosted their balance sheets by some $12 trillion to make those ETFs rise. That’s not a good reason to buy them.”
But ETFs set you up for even bigger losses…
An index such as the S&P 500 is “cap-weighted.” That means you end up owning more of the most popular stocks in an index – the ones with the biggest market “caps” – and fewer of the less popular ones.
These popular stocks tend to get bid up too much more than they are worth. And then when the market goes down – it always does – they’re the ones that will lose the most.
A lot of ETF buyers are not serious investors. They’re looking for easy money in a rising market. When the market goes down, they’ll bail out fast.
Look, you don’t get something for nothing. That’s why research pays off. It gets you away from the popular stocks in the big indexes. You have the chance of getting into companies that are reasonably priced, well-run, and more profitable than their peers.
Over the long run, those companies – chosen carefully and bought at fair prices – might prove to be good investments. ETFs? Probably not.
Tomorrow… a more fundamental reason why the big index-tracking ETFs (with exceptions for specific sectors… or country funds…) probably won’t make you rich.
P.S. It is a tough climate here on the ranch. So dry, your heels crack. So windy, sometimes you can barely see for all the dust in the air. And so high, you can barely breathe. “The wind blows the air away,” the locals say.
Surprisingly, it is a climate that produces a very good wine. All of the big farms and ranches in the area have small vineyards. The neighbors we visited on Monday offered us their wine with lunch.
“It’s amazing. These harsh places can produce some of the best wine in the world,” said the owner. “But they are unknown outside of the area. They are too small to export.”
Later in the week, we’ll explain why we HAD to export our wine. Finally, we completed the regulatory requirements. And now we have 4,000 bottles in a New Jersey warehouse… ready to ship. If you’d like more details, you can learn more here.
By Chris Mayer, Editor, Chris Mayer’s Focus
Editor’s Note: As Bill mentioned above, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are popular among investors right now. But in today’s insight, Chris Mayer shows why investing blindly in these funds can be a risky proposition.
Investors routinely treat stocks as if they’re all basically the same and will basically move in the same general direction together.
Whether you thought stocks would go up in 2016 or whether you thought they’d go down in 2016, you were wrong on both counts. The only right answer is to say that some stocks went up and some went down.
Take a look at the table below, which shows the top and bottom performers in the S&P 500 last year:
After seeing this, does it make much sense to talk about “U.S. stocks” as a whole? The disparity here is enormous and typical.
Recently, I read a great collection of essays by Murray Stahl, the big brain behind the money management firm Horizon Kinetics. In more than a few essays, he shows the danger of generalization.
An example is the PowerShares Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). The fund has $132 million in assets. Presumably, all the people who put money here were looking to get exposure to the leisure and entertainment industry.
However, the obvious conclusion is wrong.
As Stahl points out, the top holdings of PEJ include some baffling choices. McDonald’s is the third-largest holding at 5% of the fund (as of August). And the next largest holdings – slots 4 through 8 – were as follows:
Southwest Airlines, 4.9%
American Airlines, 4.9%
United Continental Holdings, 4.7%
Delta Air Lines, 4.4%
SkyWest Airlines, 3.2%
That’s about a quarter of the fund in airline stocks. Sounds like an airline ETF to me. As Stahl joked, “Perhaps the logic is one needs to fly before one can have entertainment, and while one is being entertained, what is better than a Big Mac?”
Even stranger, PEJ doesn’t own obvious choices, such as Disney. Nor does it own Lions Gate Entertainment, which makes movies. It even has “entertainment” in the name.
A funny duck, that PEJ is…
Yet this is the way investing is today. It’s industrial investing, like industrial farming. It doesn’t have to taste like a real tomato. It just has to look like one so they can sell it to you.
— Chris Mayer
P.S. Tomorrow night, I’m hosting a free investing webinar to show readers how I identify stocks – like the one that just gave readers an opportunity to make 100% gains in barely six months – before they take off. I’d love it if you could join me for this free event. Reserve your spot right here.
Most of the S&P 500’s Growth Is From Three Companies
It is estimated that one-third of the gains in the S&P 500 are from Facebook, Alphabet (Google’s parent company), and Amazon.com. Now, the lack of breadth in growth has got some investors nervous…
ETF Executives Want Their Own Index
Bill already showed you that exchange-traded funds are the hottest new investment vehicle. Now, some fund executives are even suggesting an ETF-exclusive index to rival the S&P 500.
Why Cryptocurrencies Are Skyrocketing
Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are some of the fastest-growing assets in 2017. Colleague Teeka Tiwari has identified two forces propelling these cryptos higher and suggests an easy way to play this trend today.
In today’s mailbag, readers weigh in on Bill’s recent health scare…
Your trial run at dying hit a chord with me. I have always been bothered by the term “passed” instead of the terminal word “dead.” I like the expressions you listed, but glad it was imaginary not real… we need your continued insights and hovering around the truth about the ironies and complexities of life and living.
– John H.
Sorry to hear about your heart/breathing problem! The same thing happened to me here in the altitude of Colorado. To prevent it from happening again, the doctor installed three stints. The bill was $108,000!! One and a half days in the hospital!
The doctor showed me an example of the stints. They looked like something you could buy at the hardware store, for less than a dollar. No surgery, just installed through a leg vein. Health care in the USA may be the best, but $108,000?
– William C.
$800 for X-rays, ECG, CAT scan, blood tests & ultrasound? Argentina sounds like the place to be. A few years ago, I took my pet cat to the veterinarian. I paid more than £600+ (UK) for treatment and an overnight stay (for the cat!). The Argentine health system sounds like value for money. Glad to hear you got the all-clear, Bill.
– Nick P.
Sorry to hear of your experience with impending doom of your earthly persona. If you really want to make your death clear just come out and say “Bill Bonner is dead.” That would be short, eloquent, direct, and unambivalent. Besides, do you really care if they say of you “Good, he’s dead” or “He’s good and dead” as long as they say SOMETHING good about you?
– William C.
Your health can be improved by breathing molecular hydrogen and drinking hydrogen infused water. It is the smallest antioxidant capable to penetrate even inside the mitochondria because of its tiny size. Hydrogen is approved as a deep sea diving gas. It will scavenge selectively all free radicals and leave the good ones intact.
– Bernhard P.
Glad to hear you’re still alive. That must have been genuinely really scary: we’ve probably all had the experience, but not 5 hours from help! Please take care of yourself and keep writing. I don’t agree with you on everything, but I learn a lot from your Diary and really look forward to reading it.
– Dave F.
Has your family given thought to supporting a helicopter based at a creditable health clinic/hospital? After all wealth is to be used where the return is most appreciated.
– Leonard H.
Sounds like you may be having trouble acclimatizing as you get older. I have a friend who became ill just going up to a ski area at 4,200 feet base elevation when we stayed for several days. I understand Hawthorn supplement can help with oxygen transfer. Also, keep some O2 around. Good luck. I enjoy the Diary.
– Mike R.
Chris Mayer is the only analyst whose recommendations Bill follows with money from his own family trust. And it’s not hard to see why…
An independent review of Chris’ recommendations from 2004 to 2014 revealed that he beat the market 3-to-1. He also found individual stocks that soared 41%… 114%… 233%… even 269%… in as little as three months.
And Chris just released another free training video where he shows you his “Mayer Method” for picking these highfliers before they take off. Watch right here.