POITOU, FRANCE – Guess what U.S. stocks did yesterday…

They went up, of course. Just like they always do.

Some people have expressed wonder… and doubt… that the equity value of America’s businesses can increase so much even while national leadership is in so much disarray.

Republicans can’t work with Democrats. Democrats can’t work with the president. And Republicans can’t work with the president, either… or each other.

Together… they can’t work at all.

Primary Trend

At the start of the year, analysts explained stock market gains as a “reflation trade.”

The idea was that lower taxes and more infrastructure spending under the new Trump administration would set off an economic boom with higher growth rates, higher sales, higher inflation… and, of course, higher stock prices.

None of those things happened – except the higher stock prices.

Go figure.

We wish our old friend Richard Russell were still alive to help us figure it out.

Richard studied the stock market, day by day, for over half a century in his newsletter, Dow Theory Letters. He started his career in New York and ended it in La Jolla, California, keeping his eye on the stock market all the time.

Until the end of his life, his instincts were sharp.

It was Richard who introduced us to the idea of big, long movements in stock prices – what he called the stock market’s “primary trend.”

Yes, the market goes up and it goes down… apparently at random. But over the long run, it also follows patterns – moves that you can only see from a distance.

The idea is to buy near the bottom and sell near the top. Everything else is detail.

Ringing the Bell

After World War I, gold – real money – flowed into the U.S. France and Britain had borrowed heavily and were now repaying.

This increase in the money supply – along with the invention of automobiles, electric appliances, and consumer credit – set off a boom.

Stocks soared and everyone wanted to get in on it. By the late 1920s, waiters were getting rich. And shoeshine boys were giving stock tips (which is supposedly what convinced JFK’s father, Joseph Kennedy, to sell out).

“The stock market will always find your weakness and exploit it,” Richard would say.

Greed is a weakness. Envy is another. A 6% return is fine… until your brother-in-law makes 10%.

When stocks go down, everybody wants out. When they go up, everybody wants in. And when everyone has bought into the myth of ever-rising stock prices, it’s time to sell.

“They don’t ring a bell at the top,” say the old-timers.

But the old-timers, like Richard, heard bells ringing anyway.

As it happened, stocks collapsed in 1929… the margin calls went out… investors lost fortunes… banks failed… the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations intervened… and the Great Depression took hold.

Stocks hit bottom in 1933. Then they recovered. But they didn’t return to their 1929 values until 1956 – 27 years later.

From there, the U.S. stock market kept heading up for another 10 years. This brought the primary bull market trend to 33 years. But by then, the old fellow was losing his vim and vigor.

That was the era of the Nifty Fifty – 50 large “growth” stocks that investors believed would dominate the world and make them all rich by simply buying and holding.

Naturally, those 50 stocks – including the now-defunct photographic film and camera makers Eastman Kodak and Polaroid – led the market higher.

Bear’s Lair

But another of Richard’s dicta was “the bear always wants to take as many people down as possible.”

We invent reasons to do dumb things. Instead of doing careful stock market research, mom-and-pop investors simply rushed into the Nifty Fifty… directly into the bear’s lair.

By August of 1966, the top was in, with these “one decision” stocks at their peak.

Richard, who was already on the job, heard the bells ringing. And for the next 16 years (though the numbers are distorted by high inflation rates during this period), stock prices fell.

By the early 1970s, stocks were reaching another major low. At one point, you could have bought the Dow Industrials for just one ounce of gold.

In 1979, Businessweek magazine published its famous “Death of Equities” cover story. But equities weren’t dead at all. They were just reviving after a long primary trend lower.

What followed is recent history. Starting in 1982, stocks began a new bullish primary trend… and rose for almost two decades. In the summer of 1999, thanks to the wonders of the internet, investors thought they had entered a “new era” of ever-rising stock prices.

It was not to be. The dot-coms crashed. But investors were right in another sense. It was a new era of financial hocus-pocus, with the feds intervening to support stock prices as they never had before.

After former Fed chief Alan Greenspan rushed to pump up stocks in 1987, the fix was in.

Since then, stocks have tried to correct twice. The Nasdaq collapsed in 2000; the entire U.S. stock market took a plunge in 2008.

Each time, the Fed came to the rescue. In 2009, it mounted its largest bailout ever. It stuffed the financial sector with $3.6 trillion of fake money via three separate quantitative easing (QE) programs.

And now – taking 1982 as the beginning point – this bull run has been romping for 35 years.

What would Richard say about it?

“I don’t know…” says a voice from the grave.

“It could be my cell phone. Or it could be my tinnitus acting up. But I hear something ringing…”

Regards,

Signature

Bill

 

Economic Insight: Construction Spending Slumps


BY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE, Bonner & partners


bill bonner

More signs of trouble for the economy…

One of Team Trump’s signature policy proposals was a major splurge on infrastructure.

This would not only boost GDP… it would also create jobs in the building trade.

But as you can see from today’s chart, despite this pledge, year-over-year growth in construction spending peaked in 2014 and has been trending lower ever since.

It’s down 89% from its March 2014 peak… and down 78% since Inauguration Day.

Chris Lowe

Featured Reads

How Credit Raters Ducked Reform
Credit rating agencies assign creditworthiness scores to borrowers and financial institutions. The financial crisis was made worse by credit rating agencies showering banks with AAA ratings, allowing them to collect toxic assets. And 10 years later, not much has changed…

American Infrastructure Is Crumbling
Ten years ago, a bridge spanning the Mississippi River collapsed, killing 13. And surprisingly, little has been done to fix America’s failing infrastructure since then.

Banks Work for the Government Now
Most people don’t realize it, but banks have become an arm of the federal government. Editor at Large Chris Lowe reveals what government restrictions could mean for your life savings.

Mailbag

In today’s mailbag, readers consider if marriage is win-win… or win-lose.

Well, you got it mostly right. Marriage USED TO BE “win-win”… then the reconstruction after the second American war for independence, often erroneously called the “Civil War,” ushered in “Marriage Licenses” and with it government oversight and control of marriages.

More importantly giving government control of what constitutes a “marriage” and when and how one could be dissolved. Any doubt that marriage today is a win-lose deal need only look at the divorce settlements of any one of my half dozen friends who got more of the “worse” from the “better or worse” deal.

– Joe J.

I read your article on the biggest win-win deal ever – marriage. I take umbrage at the part where you affirm that men are still fools and women’s role is to tell them so (even if it was in jest.) I consider that a lose-lose type of marriage. Men are not fools nor is it – ever – a woman’s role to tell them so, whether it’s true or not.

Any that do so have created a lose-lose marriage. Win-win marriages occur when both parties receive a benefit from the union without harm. Being or acting a fool and telling or acting like your partner is a fool harms both parties as well as any offspring. That’s lose-lose. The fact is, any relationship follows this same rule. Win-win creates mutual benefit without harm. Why would you say a marriage is any different?

– Linda H.

Just wanted to say how much I enjoyed reading your reflection on marriage, the description of your journey to the medieval church and the land’s history.

– Christine Z.

Just read your message about marriage as a “win-win deal.” My granddaughter is getting married in November, and with your permission, I would like to read this message to the newlyweds at their reception. I enjoy your writing and look forward to your Diary every day.

– Thomas A.

Editor’s Note: The Diary team would be happy to have a reader share Bill’s words with friends and family. Be sure to send a note to our mailbag to let us know how it goes.

In Case You Missed It…

In the 15th century, a financial blueprint tied to Leonardo da Vinci revolutionized early commerce. This innovation, some scholars say, “gave birth to capitalism.”

Now, more than 500 years later, a new piece of technology is primed to transform capitalism a second time… and deliver huge gains to early investors.

See “The Da Vinci Device” for yourself right here.