LONDON – By the time you read this, we’ll be giving a speech to an investment group in London.
Investors will want to know what’s ahead. Will prices go up? Or down?
“Yes,” we will answer.
At best, we will help connect a few more dots…
The big dot we’ve been looking at this week is Team Trump’s proposed tax cut, now causing indignation and puzzlement throughout the nation.
Who will benefit? Who will pay?
At first, we considered the proposal beneath contempt and beyond contemplation. It was silly and inconsequential.
What’s more, it could never pass. So why bother to think about it?
But the more we looked, the more it seemed to take on a kind of gravity, drawing other big dots toward itself into a kind of planetary system… with orbiting moons in cyclical patterns… comets and asteroids appearing suddenly without warning… and swirling dust confusing everything.
That’s the universe we live in!
And the tax cut proposal helps us see it.
Why can’t Congress pass a serious tax reform measure?
Because the feds need money. They can only get money from the people who have it – the rich.
But the rich control the government and its tax-writing committees. So, the feds are stuck. And so is the entire economy.
Like the ancien régime in France before they started cutting off heads, the Deep State cannot reform itself. And the mob still must be appeased… with pensions, pills, and welfare payments – which cost money.
This contradiction can only be reconciled – temporarily – with credit.
This is why every major economy runs big deficits… and why there’s a black hole of debt that is sucking all the world’s major economies down… closer and closer to a debt disaster.
But let us pick up where we left off yesterday. Although U.S. government debt was going up 20 times, since 1980, there was no sign of “crowding out” in the debt markets. (The “crowding out effect” describes how increases in government borrowing force up interest rates for everyone.)
Yesterday, we explained that the new fake money… made available at the Fed’s ultra-low rates… meant credit was almost completely elastic.
When it began to get tight – as it did in 1987, 2000, and 2007 – the Fed stretched it out even further.
The U.S. added almost $10 trillion to its debt since 2007. But thanks to the Fed, which provided all the money the system required – and then some – interest rates didn’t go up. Instead, they went down again.
That was former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan’s conundrum.
But here’s the bigger conundrum: How could it be that total outstanding U.S. debt – consumer, government, and business debt – compared to GDP, could go up some $35 trillion since 1980?
That’s $35 trillion of private-sector spending that wouldn’t have happened had the “crowding out effect” – the old connection between real money, output, savings, and debt – been respected.
And how come all this new buying power, based on credit, didn’t send prices soaring?
It has to go somewhere. But where?
The simple answer: It went somewhere… but not to Detroit, Michigan, or Donora, Pennsylvania.
There is a Main Street economy and a financial economy. There are consumer prices and capital prices (stocks, bonds, real estate, etc.).
Consumer prices didn’t rise for two reasons.
First, households didn’t have the money to spend; earnings were flat.
Second, when they did spend, they bought gadgets and gizmos from China. The U.S. money supply was increasing, but much of it was going overseas, where it was creating a boom in manufacturing, infrastructure, and real estate.
The tsunami of new credit also created a boom on Wall Street – the home office of the financial economy – where stock market prices rose 22 times since 1980.
That’s a 2,200% gain. A dollar’s worth of stocks in 1980 now will cost you $22.
If home prices had gone up as much, the median house in America today would cost $1,320,000. Instead, it’s about $300,000.
Only in a few areas – Wall Street’s bedroom communities, for example – do you find houses selling for an average of $1,320,000.
And if Detroit’s automobiles had risen as much as Wall Street’s stocks, your next set of wheels would cost you about $120,000.
But a new car today costs only about $30,000. And go to Detroit today and you can buy the median house for only $40,000, which is less than the nationwide median in 1980.
And now Fed chair Janet Yellen is puzzled…
It’s a “mystery,” she says. With the U.S. supposedly at full employment (suggesting that the economy is operating near capacity)… and the Fed’s key rate still below zero in real terms… consumer prices ought to be going up.
But the latest consumer price inflation figures show prices rising at a yearly rate of only 1.5%… not the 2% that Ms. Yellen wants.
Because the system is rigged up with phony money… and now depends on it.
There is no crowding out of private borrowers because the supply of fake savings is, theoretically at least, infinite. So, interest rates don’t rise… and don’t automatically correct excesses in the capital markets.
And consumer price inflation doesn’t go up either. Because it’s credit that is flooding the world, not real money.
The credit boosts Wall Street and China. It doesn’t have much effect on consumer prices. It doesn’t go to Detroit homeowners or Donora steelworkers.
So, the Fed doesn’t see higher inflation or higher yields. It never corrects its mistake, because it never gets the message.
At least… for now. But that is about to change in a big way.
Now, the Fed promises to push on with raising short-term interest rates. Instead of its quantitative easing (buying bonds with newly created cash and adding them to its balance sheet), it has begun a policy of quantitative tightening (letting that balance sheet shrink).
Instead of the EZ money – the only kind of money a generation has known – it promises a new policy.
Hard money, it says, is the new thing. Starting this month, the Fed says, it will gradually reduce the bond pile it built up since Mr. Greenspan began to back up the capital markets in 1987…
And when new credit begins to tighten… when investors get their first hint that the EZ money is over… worlds collide.
The financial economy – tricked up by Fed credit for the last four decades – will run right into the real Main Street economy.
Both will be smashed.
And then, and here we don’t think we’re going very far out on a limb: then, the Fed will get the message…
And once again… react inappropriately, of course. More to come.
BY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE, Bonner & partners
Stock market investors are more complacent now than any other time in the past 27 years.
That’s the message of today’s chart – one we track closely at the Diary – Wall Street’s “fear gauge,” the VIX Index.
A rising VIX signals that investors are increasingly fearful of big swings in stock prices over the next 30 days.
A falling VIX means investors see calmer waters ahead.
As you can see, the VIX closed at a new record low of 9.2 yesterday.
That’s the lowest level since data became available in 1990.
– Chris Lowe
Trump’s Tax Plan Already Hitting Road Blocks
As Bill has pointed out all week, Trump’s tax ambitions are facing an uphill climb. Here are some of the obstacles a Trump tax reform faces.
Why Are European Stocks Cheaper?
European stock markets have been rallying this year. And September was the best month for European stocks in all of 2017. Despite this, EU stocks are consistently cheaper than their American counterparts. Here’s one possible reason why…
America’s New Civil War
Our colleague Nick Giambruno has traveled to some of the most war-ravaged countries on the planet. So he speaks with some authority when he says that the U.S. is headed for a new type of civil war. Nick reveals what’s causing this civil strife and why you need to prepare today.
In the mailbag today, readers consider the impact of the Reagan presidency…
When presenting the information about the Reagan era, why omit the first 7 weeks of his administration? During those 7 weeks, wasn’t Ron doing exactly everything he had promised in his 1980 campaign? Plus all the same promises from the prior years of his campaigns for POTUS? Why omit John Hinckley? And how after the John Hinckley condition, Ron was no longer his former self?
Nor that H.W. Bush was from then onward the one who was pulling nearly all the strings for Ron’s actions? Isn’t this “under-reporting” much the same as the Fake News from the mainstream media? The most pertinent key to the messages is deliberately omitted.
– Norm K.
You credit Reagan with failing to cut spending, but as I remember, in his push to cut spending, the Democrat Congress bargained with Reagan, saying:
“We will pass your tax cut bill now and when the economy picks up, we will pass the spending cuts.”
Reagan yielded. However, the second part of the agreement never came to pass.
– Leonard H.
Meanwhile, another congratulation for Bill on being part of the “One Percent.”
Congratulations!!!! Funny how things work out sometimes. You worked hard and deserve to be among the elite 1%. I am equally sure I deserve to be among the lower end of the 90%. I worked hard my whole life, too. The problem is that was all I was doing. Working hard. Neither I, nor my parents, were wise enough to peek around the other side of the curtain and see how the system really worked.
This whole time I have been going about my life thinking I was doing the right thing… completely unaware that I was on the wrong route. Right train, wrong track! The school of hard knocks tripped me up and I must have gotten dirt in my eye. I failed to continue my education. Darn, I hate having to confess ignorance. I am going to keep working hard because that is the kind of person I am.
– Carolyn G.
In the next few weeks, California could experience Venezuela-like rolling blackouts.
That’s the message from our colleagues at Casey Research. They’ve uncovered a story that suggests California could soon need a $2.1 billion energy bailout. Plenty of political careers could end overnight, but a handful of investors stand to profit immensely. See how right here.