BALTIMORE, Maryland – Today, a first-hand account of a visit to America’s most expensive private house… and what it tells us about our nation’s fictitious economy.
But first, a headline from Bloomberg yesterday:
The Dow fell 358 points – a 2% drop. The Nikkei and the Shanghai Composite fell, too (and tumbled badly again this morning). Gold climbed to a six-and-a-half-week high.
What puzzles us is not why stocks are going down but why anyone thought they were worth so much in the first place.
The defining feature of modern public life is that no one knows what anything is worth… and almost everything reported is a fraud.
Markets, elections, the economy, even our wars – all are rigged… none are what they appear to be.
We’ve been describing how and why the feds and the cronies in America’s C-suites have been jacking up stock prices.
But it’s not just stock prices that are rigged; it’s the whole damned system.
Almost no one realizes it. Because almost everything we hear comes from the riggers. It’s a Great Zombie War; most of the “information,” “statistics,” and “opinions” you read are nothing more than propaganda.
The popular narrative is that the U.S. economy grew strongly in the 1990s and up to 2007. Then capitalism hit a crisis, caused by too much greed and too little regulation. Thank God the feds were on the job, or we would have had another Great Depression!
Simple. Easy to remember. But every element of it is a lie.
First, the economy was already scammy and unproductive in the 1990s.
In 2007, it wasn’t greedy capitalism that went into crisis; it was greedy cronyism.
Finally, it wasn’t the feds who saved the situation. They made it worse. Too much debt caused the 2008 global financial crisis; the feds gave us more.
It’s hard to know what is going on because the feds weigh up the situation and report the essential numbers. Trouble is, like a crooked butcher, they put their fat thumbs on the scale to make it look as though there’s more meat.
For instance, GDP is an entirely useless measure…
It keeps track of economic activity, but it doesn’t tell you whether the activity makes us better or worse off. Nor does it tell you whether the activity makes any sense.
Here’s an illustration: A while back, we went to visit a piece of real estate in Florida.
At the time, it was the most expensive house ever offered for sale in the U.S. – a concrete monstrosity on the market at $139 million.
And because of that, the sales agents required a complete financial disclosure before they’d give you a tour. Fair enough. They wanted to be sure they weren’t wasting their time. And they probably also wanted to be sure we weren’t casing the joint.
In any case, we weren’t about to give them our financial details. So, we contented ourselves with a look from the outside, which satisfied us completely.
The place was so remarkably ugly… so tasteless and gaudy… and so expensive to operate, we wouldn’t take it if it were given to us for free.
That was last year. Apparently there has been some slack in the sales process. Recently, the sellers called us back. No need for financial disclosures now!
Our colleague saw the inside this week. He reports:
Why bring up the posh pad in Pompano?
Because it was built – like much of the U.S. over the last 20 years – on false pretenses. And all that cement, gold leaf, and workmanship was included in U.S. GDP figures.
Most likely, they would never have been put to use had the feds allowed the market to set interest rates rather than having the Fed artificially fix them at or close to zero.
Instead, what they reflected was the Fed’s ability to push down borrowing costs… and make what Karl Marx called “fictitious capital” available to fictitious capitalists.
And this fiction contributed to another big fiction – widely distributed in the mainstream media – that the economy was “recovering.”
But building Cyclopean palaces does not necessarily add to the nation’s wealth. Sometimes it subtracts from it. It depends on whether the finished product is worth more, or less, than the value of the resources that went into it.
Too many dot-coms… too many cheap houses and subprime-backed mortgage bonds… too many frackers in the Midwest… too many factories in China… too many shopping malls in America – wherever and whenever it occurs, cheap money causes people to overdo it.
GDP figures are supposed to measure at what pace the economy is growing. But as the feds calculate them, they tell more lies than a presidential hopeful.
What they are measuring is “activity,” not growth. So, if we borrow a million dollars and use it to buy a house, it shows a million dollars of growth, despite the fact that no one has gained a penny.
We have a million-dollar house and a million-dollar loan. Net: zero.
It looks good, but only as long as the zombies are winning… interest rates remain ultra-low… and nobody notices that the whole thing is a bamboozle.
Further Reading: The wealth-stealing effects of cronyism are very real. As controversial economist James Dale Davidson explains in his essay “Crony Capitalists Cost You a Fortune,” a new study claims that the “Great Predators” in Washington have cost you more than $100,000 in lost income every year since 2011.
It’s of the S&P 500. And as you can see, gone are the years when the index shot up 30%… setting 45 new record highs along the way (as it did in 2013).
This year’s performance would even make you wistful for 2014, when the market rose 11% for the year… setting 53 new highs along the way (or more than one a week).
The good news: The S&P 500 is up 2% so far in 2015.
The bad news: It’s no longer a “one-way street.” Volatility is now the name of the game.
Are the Days of Double-Digit Stock Market Gains Over?
Over the six-year period ending in 2014, the S&P 500, including dividends, returned a stunning 159%. That’s a compounded annual return of around 17%. But the future may look nothing like the past…
It’s Been a Horrible Year for Asia
Trade slowing, currencies weakening, stocks falling, economic growth waning, and political wobbles emerging. 2015 is proving to be a bumpy year in what’s meant to be the Asian century.
Simple Math Can Help Determine if Your Dividend Is Safe
Dividend-yielding stocks can be a great way to generate steady income… but only if they keep flowing. In last Saturday’s issue of Diary, Marc Lichtenfeld explained how he calculates the safety level of his dividends.
A note from a wavering Bill Bonner Letter subscriber…
I’m nearing the end of my 90-day trial offer of your service and I think I will cancel.
Because you are constantly and without my permission very annoyingly selling to me. I paid you for your service and that does NOT include providing you with the opportunity on a daily basis to inundate me with flaky sale offers promising me, “2,000% returns over what I am currently receiving.”
Frankly, I do not see significant value nor originality in your communications and I am very suspicious of your highly questionable “advice” because of your constant selling efforts and your aggressive upselling techniques.
You really do not have my best interests at heart – what you are most interested in is mining my bank account for your sole financial benefit.
If I’m wrong then please surprise me and demonstrate your sincerity by publishing my comments in your daily piecetomorrow. I’m not holding my breath for that to happen.
Bill Comment: Alas, you’re not alone!
We hear from subscribers every day who feel the way you do. And we even feel that way ourselves from time to time.
Subscribers don’t like to feel like we are preying on them – like a hawk looking for field mice. We don’t like having to work so hard coming up with snappy new sales pitches. We also don’t like it when customers think we are a bunch of shysters.
But the thing is… our model – though noisy and over-the-top in many ways – is the most honest way of doing business we can find.
By that I mean it aligns your interests with our interests. Unlike the mainstream press, we don’t make our money from corporate advertisers. And unlike Wall Street, we don’t take commissions or fees from the companies we cover in our newsletters.
Instead, we sell ideas, information, opinions, and recommendations. What you see is what you get. There’s no more to it. All we have to offer is words… sometimes sober, sometimes wild.
(As Keynes put it, “Words must be a little wild, because they are the assaults of thoughts…”)
In more than three decades in the business, we have built a loyal readership. Our marketing – offering strongly worded opinions and ideas – has helped make that possible. And it is the only thing that makes it possible for us to send out a free daily commentary, for example.
The Diary takes about four hours a day to research and write. And there are a half-dozen other people who edit and make sure that it gets sent out.
You get all of this at no cost to you. All we ask is that you keep an open mind about the other products and services that are offered. That’s the deal.
But if you’d prefer not to hear about opportunities from us, you can simply unsubscribe from the Diary. You’ll find instructions on how to do that in the footer of this email.
If you choose to unsubscribe from the Diary, you’ll continue to receive your monthly issues of The Bill Bonner Letter.
And of course, if you also wish to cancel your subscription to The Bill Bonner Letter, that’s your choice.
No hard feelings. But we’d be sorry to see you go…